Skip to content

See the method →

Built for AEC, by AEC

Workforce optimization intelligencefor AEC firms

Atlas is a digital twin of your firm's capabilities: every colleague, mapped to the work they can actually deliver. See team gaps, skill availability, and execution risk before you commit.

Every answer computed from your firm's internal data plus 4,324 cited facts across 1,069 public sources, with a person in the loop.

Live · modeled now
real workspace, anonymized
Can we execute the $61M data center in Northern Virginia?
Modeled in 4s
Not as scoped. You are 17 seats short across three benches, and the fix costs $1.7M.
every number opens to its evidence
Not deliverable as scoped
You have the skill, not the bench.
1719expertise short
$61.1M$61.1Mrevenue at risk
$1.7M$1.9Mto protect it
36×32×return on fix
Electrical / Power
11 short
MEP
3 short
Structural
3 short
Model a demand shift+0%+13%
The slider no other software has. Drag demand, watch the answer change.
The gap

Do we have the expertise to deliver?

Your systems

  • HRISPeople and titles
  • ERPUtilization
  • CRMPursuits
  • FinanceMargin and backlog
Atlas

What Atlas unlocks

  • Pursuit ReadinessCan we deliver this?
  • Digital TwinCollective skills of your entire organization
  • Mergers and AcquisitionsSkill discovery and overlap
  • Workforce EconomicsEffect of capability gaps on your profit margins

The problem nobody else touchesYour systems track fragments. None can tell you whether you can actually deliver. Atlas starts with people: every individual's skills, verified against internal data and cited public evidence, then built upward through projects, finances, and strategy. One picture of real capability.

Answers your ERP, HR, and CRM can't give you

Your siloed data, reimagined.

Opportunity readiness
Pursue with staffing risk

Scored from the RFP against your live bench, in seconds.

Discipline coverage
Availability
Comparable delivery
Recommended team
From your bench
EmployeeMatch · availability
  • N. AlexandrosSenior Principal85Good fit44%Available
  • A. Mehta, PEPrincipal80Good fit58%Limited
  • S. DonnellyMng. Principal75Good fit76%High utilization
  • W. CooperAssoc. Principal70Possible91%Overallocated
Gap to close
2 senior structural engineers
On the table
$14.2M
Cost to close
$460K
31× return
Hire4–6 months
Subcontract3–5 weeks
Upskill2 quarters

Every path priced before the go/no-go meeting.

$61.1M
revenue at risk, caught before the commit
36×
return on the fix Atlas priced
4,324
cited facts behind one firm's twin
4s
from question to answer
The results

First of its kind AI, built specifically for AEC

  1. Pick a pursuitWin the next hyperscale campus. Stack a second supertall. Lose your structural lead.
  2. Read the verdictThe same capacity engine as your live dashboards, in plain English: deliverable or not, the revenue at risk, and the play that fixes it.
  3. Drag demandA modest shift adds roles you cannot recruit in time. That margin is the part no one models.

This one is live. Go ahead

← Portfolio Coverage/MeridianWHAT-IF
Win the next hyperscale campus
Data center Phase 2 · Electrical + MEP program
Stack a second supertall
High-rise residential · structural + geotech
Stress-test your structural concentration
What if you lost your senior structural lead?
Not deliverable as scoped

You have the skill, not the bench. Phase 2 pulls from Electrical and MEP at once, your two thinnest benches. Winning it leaves won work you can't staff.

Expertise short
17
5 ▲ 17 people
Revenue at risk
$61.1M
$28.6M ▲ $61.1M
Cost to protect
$1.7M
all-in first-year hire cost
Return on the fix
36×
$1 protects ▲ $36
Why it breaks: demand vs. available bench
Electrical & Power11 short
Bench covers ~13% of what this program needs
MEP Engineering3 short
Bench covers ~25% of what this program needs
Structural3 short
3 roles with no one available

Demand lands on more than one bench at once, so hiring into a single discipline still leaves it unstaffable.

Margin for changeThe part no one models
+0%
As scoped+13%+25%
17
Expertise short
$61.1M
Revenue at risk

On paper this staffed. Drag it: a modest shift adds roles you can't recruit before ramp. You'd be committing with almost no margin, and something always moves.

Winning it starves 1 active pursuitFinite bench
K-12 Educational Campus Program, Northern New Jersey1 Structural Engineer reassigned to the surge$8.5M
Recommended play

Don't hire piecemeal: build the power bench or bring in an MEP specialist.

A dozen electrical, MEP, and commissioning seats is too many to recruit before energization milestones hit. Folding in a mission-critical MEP boutique covers the scarce roles.

The digital twin

Predict any outcome

Atlas rebuilds your firm as a digital twin: every colleague, license, and project, backed by cited evidence. Then you can question it. Not the things you already know, but the ones no one can hold in their head: what happens to the bench when two pursuits land in the same quarter, and which one to move.

What if we win both in the same quarter?
Either one alone
Hyperscale campus
$24M · 21 roles
Leans on electrical and MEP
Second supertall
$18M · 11 roles
Leans on structural
Together

All three thin benches come due in the same quarter.

DisciplineRoles to fill
Electrical / Power6 to fill
MEP4 to fill
Structural1 person qualified4 to fill

Geotech and civil are deep enough to absorb both. These three are not.

Run them back to back and you hire into one bench at a time. Run them together and $42M depends on three benches you have not built yet.

Modeled on the live twin: 272 colleagues, every claim cited, refreshed as the firm changes

  • Every claim cited
  • Single points of failure flagged
  • Credential coverage at a glance
Readiness

No other software can model this.

Frontier AI pointed at the problems only an AEC firm has. Ask in plain language, get the answer in seconds, with the evidence behind every line.

01 · Portfolio coverage
Portfolio Coverage

See capability gaps in dollars, not vibes

See capability gaps in dollars: revenue at risk, cost to protect it, across every client relationship.

Explore the service
What is at risk across our clients?
The delivery gap

You're on track to win $29M of work you can't staff.

5
expertise short
$29M
at risk
$400K
to protect it
Client readinessRevenue exposed
  • Confidential hyperscale developer75GOOD$12.5M
  • Mid-Atlantic private university83STRONG$8.5M
  • Brooklyn residential developer100STRONG$5.2M
  • NJ schools development authority86STRONG$2.8M

Weighted across six active client relationships, recomputed as the roster and pipeline change.

02 · Roster intelligence
Roster Intelligence

Ask your roster anything. Get cited answers.

Ask in plain language. “Who has run a hospital job over $50M?” Atlas answers with cited evidence, and shows where a single resignation would hurt.

Explore the service
Show me single points of failure
MATCHESEVElena Vasquez, RPLSAssociate Principal · DallasSINGLE POINT OF FAILURELICENSERPLS · TexasPROJECTALTA/NSPS route surveyWHY FLAGGEDOnly RPLS-licensed surveyoracross the Dallas officeMWMarcus Webb, PE, GEAssociate Principal · IrvineLICENSEGE + F.ASCESKILLHigh-rise · up-downDODaniel Okafor, CIECPrincipal · ParsippanyLICENSECIEC certifiedSKILLISO/NQA systems

Every chip links to its source. Nothing locks until three independent sources agree.

03 · Pursuit readiness
Opportunity Intelligence

Know if you can deliver it before you chase it

Feed Atlas the RFP. Get a readiness score, a recommended team from your own bench, and a gap-closure plan, hire, subcontract, or upskill, with timelines.

Explore the service
Can we staff this pursuit?
67/100Pursue with staffing risk
From your benchMatch · availability
  • N. AlexandrosSenior Principal85Good fit44%Available
  • A. Mehta, PEPrincipal80Good fit58%Limited
  • S. DonnellyMng. Principal75Good fit76%High utilization
Short 2 senior structural engineers
On the table $14.2MCost to close $460K31× return

Scored from the RFP against your live bench, with every path to close the gap priced before the go/no-go meeting.

How Atlas thinks

AI finds the evidence. Math does the scoring.

No black boxes. Atlas's AI gathers and cites the evidence; deterministic scoring does the judgment.

Cited, always

Every answer links to the evidence behind it, 100% of the time.

Corroborated 3×

Nothing locks until three independent sources agree.

Deterministic scoring

Readiness scores come from transparent math, not model mood.

Instant answers

Seconds from question to answer, across your whole roster.

Getting started

How it starts

  1. Atlas reads what's public

    We build your initial capability map from published project records. Zero integrations, zero IT projects.

  2. Your team corrects and confirms

    The map gets sharper with every review.

  3. Connect systems when ready

    Phase in pipeline and utilization data, with deliverables every month.

From the founders

“One day, no AEC firm will sign a pursuit without knowing its bench can carry it. We’re building that day. Demos are with us, not a sales team.”

Portrait of Ken Dugan
Ken Dugan
Founder & CEO
Portrait of Reth Eddy
Reth Eddy
Founder & COO

Never wonder if your bench can execute its future.

We build your firm's twin before the first call. Bring a pursuit, and leave with your readiness score, the gaps, and the plan to close them.